Practical Pathways for Coordinated Burden Reduction and Quality Improvement in Primary and Secondary Schools under the Double Reduction Policy

Authors

  • Longyang Tang Lanfeng Primary School, Tongliang,Chongqing Author
  • Xiaohan Duan Affiliated Middle School of Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Yongchuan,Chongqing Author
  • Zheli Shen Affiliated Middle School of Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Yongchuan,Chongqing Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66581/mtjk6269

Keywords:

Double Reduction, burden reduction, quality improvement, homework governance, after-school service, basic education

Abstract

Objective: To construct a practical pathway for the coordinated implementation of burden reduction and quality improvement in primary and secondary schools under China's Double Reduction policy. Methods: Based on policy analysis, school-based practice reflection, and the logic of instructional improvement, this paper develops an implementation framework covering homework governance, classroom transformation, after-school services, home-school collaboration, and evaluation reform. Results: The study identifies a five-dimensional pathway: clarifying school-level governance responsibilities, redesigning homework as diagnostic learning evidence, improving classroom efficiency through deep learning tasks, building differentiated after-school services, and replacing score-centered accountability with process-oriented quality monitoring. Conclusion: The key to Double Reduction is not a simple decrease in learning time, but a structural shift from external pressure to internal quality. Schools can achieve sustainable burden reduction only when curriculum, teaching, homework, services, and evaluation are redesigned as an integrated system.

References

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74.

Bray, M. (2009). Confronting the Shadow Education System: What Government Policies for What Private Tutoring? Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning.

Epstein, J. L. (2011). School, Family, and Community Partnerships: Preparing Educators and Improving Schools. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Fullan, M. (2016). The New Meaning of Educational Change. New York: Teachers College Press.

General Office of the CPC Central Committee and General Office of the State Council. (2021). Opinions on Further Reducing the Homework Burden and Off-Campus Training Burden of Students in Compulsory Education.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. London: Routledge.

OECD. (2013). Synergies for Better Learning: An International Perspective on Evaluation and Assessment. Paris: OECD Publishing.

UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining Our Futures Together: A New Social Contract for Education. Paris: UNESCO.

Xue, E., & Li, J. (2022). What is the value essence of China's Double Reduction policy? A policy narrative perspective. Educational Philosophy and Theory.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

Issue

Section

Special Collection I: Classroom teaching in primary and secondary schools

How to Cite

Tang, L., Duan, X., & Shen, Z. (2026). Practical Pathways for Coordinated Burden Reduction and Quality Improvement in Primary and Secondary Schools under the Double Reduction Policy. Journal of Psychology & Education, 1(5), 86-97. https://doi.org/10.66581/mtjk6269